Basal metabolic rate · resting calorie floor
BMR Calculator with Body Fat and Lean Mass
Estimate your resting calorie burn, compare three formulas, and add body fat for a lean-mass comparison.
Three ways to estimate BMR
Mifflin and Harris-Benedict use height, weight, age and sex. Katch-McArdle uses lean mass instead of body weight, so it is only as accurate as the body-fat figure behind it.
Mifflin-St Jeor
Men: BMR = 10 × weight (kg) + 6.25 × height (cm) - 5 × age (years) + 5
Women: BMR = 10 × weight (kg) + 6.25 × height (cm) - 5 × age (years) - 161
800 + 1,125 − 150 + 5 = 1,780 kcal (M, 30y, 180cm)Example numbers come from an 80 kg, 1.80 m, 30-year-old male at 18 percent body fat. The three formulas land within about 75 kcal of each other here, but the real uncertainty is larger: the best-validated equation predicts measured resting rate within 10 percent for most adults, about 180 kcal in this example.
BMR is the energy cost of being alive
Basal metabolic rate is the number of calories your body spends sustaining life at complete rest. Heart, brain, liver, kidneys, lungs, cell turnover. About 60 to 70 percent of total daily energy expenditure for a sedentary adult, scaling almost linearly with lean mass.
The calculator above asks for weight, height, age, sex and body fat. Your BMR comes from Mifflin-St Jeor, the equation best validated in adults. Body fat adds a Katch-McArdle comparison built on your estimated lean mass, and fills in the lean-mass figures in the result panel.
The result panel shows the BMR number itself plus what it means in context: kcal per hour, lean mass in kg, kcal per kilogram of lean mass, food equivalents, and how the number drifts with age while everything else is held still.
Where BMR sits inside total daily energy expenditure
Typical shares for a sedentary-to-moderately-active adult. Athletes push the activity slice into the 35 to 50 percent range.
Shares aligned with McMurray et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014, and Westerterp, Nutr Metab 2004. Athlete activity range from Westerterp Annu Rev Nutr 2017 doubly-labelled water meta-analysis.
The 200 kcal that every cut quietly loses
A kilogram of skeletal muscle burns roughly 13 kcal a day at rest. Lose two kilograms of muscle during a cut and resting burn drops about 26 kcal, or roughly 35 to 45 kcal of daily maintenance once activity is multiplied in, until you rebuild it.
Most calorie calculators stop at the BMR estimate and never close the loop. Eat at the deficit, lose weight, and a chunk of that weight is the engine that was setting BMR. The next plateau hits sooner. The next deficit has to go deeper to keep moving.
The fix is structural. Resistance training plus enough protein preserves most of the engine through a moderate deficit. For most people who train, 1.6 to 2.2 g of protein per kilogram of body weight is a well-supported range (Morton 2018, in people who were not in a calorie deficit). For lean, trained people dieting for a contest, Helms 2014 recommends 2.3 to 3.1 g per kilogram of lean mass. Helms 2014 and Garthe 2011 both show that the slower the cut, the more of the loss is fat and the less of it is BMR.
BMR is an estimate of resting energy needs, not a measurement of body composition. An unchanged result does not establish that muscle was retained. Review weight, measurements and training performance together.
BMR and the recomposition calorie equation, explained
Six questions that come up when people start treating BMR as a planning input instead of a curiosity.
References
- Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, et al. A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr, 1990.
- Cunningham JJ. Body composition as a determinant of energy expenditure: a synthetic review and a proposed general prediction equation. Am J Clin Nutr, 1991;54(6):963-969.
- Roza AM, Shizgal HM. The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass. Am J Clin Nutr, 1984;40(1):168-182.
- Katch FI, McArdle WD. Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition and Human Performance, 4th ed. Williams & Wilkins, 1996.
- Frankenfield D, Roth-Yousey L, Compher C. Comparison of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in healthy nonobese and obese adults. J Am Diet Assoc, 2005.
- Pontzer H, Yamada Y, et al. Daily energy expenditure through the human life course. Science, 2021.
- Morton RW, Murphy KT, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength. Br J Sports Med, 2018.
- Helms ER, Aragon AA, Fitschen PJ. Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: nutrition and supplementation. J Int Soc Sports Nutr, 2014.
- Garthe I, Raastad T, et al. Effect of two different weight-loss rates on body composition and strength and power-related performance in elite athletes. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab, 2011.