Body recomposition · Step 1

Body Fat Percentage Calculator for Recomposition

Estimate body fat %, compare the band, and use it to set the deficit, protein target, and retest cadence for body recomposition.

Choose your method

Why body fat % is body recomposition's truth-meter

During body recomposition fat goes down and lean tissue goes up at the same time. The scale barely moves, which is why the scale alone makes recomposition invisible. Body fat % separates the two and shows what is actually happening.

BMI uses only height and weight, so it inherits the same blind spot. A lifter at 14% body fat and a sedentary office worker at 24% can share an identical BMI. Recomposition is the gap between those two body fat numbers, not the BMI between them.

Treat your body fat % like a temperature reading: one measurement is noise, four readings across four weeks is the signal. Re-measure with the same method every month. The slope of that line is recomposition, in numbers.

What your body fat % implies for the recomposition protocol

ACE sex-specific bands paired with the two inputs that scale with body fat %: realistic fat-loss pace (during a cut) and protein target. Body recomposition is not one path; this is the deficit-and-lifting version. Sources below.

BandMenWomenCut pace · % BW / wkProtein · g/kg BW
Essential
Men2–5%
Women10–13%
Cut pacenot advised
Proteinn/a
Below the physiological floor. Sustained energy deficits at this level trigger RED-S: hormonal, immune, and bone consequences.
Athlete
Men6–13%
Women14–20%
Cut pace≤ 0.5%
Protein2.0–2.8
Visible muscularity. Protein needs climb because lean mass is harder to defend the leaner you go.
Fitness
Men14–17%
Women21–24%
Cut pace0.5–0.7%
Protein1.8–2.4
Around the all-cause mortality nadir. Recomposition keeps working through small deficits or maintenance.
Average
Men18–24%
Women25–31%
Cut pace0.7–1.0%
Protein1.6–2.2
The largest weekly weight change is tolerated here without disproportionate lean loss.
Above average
Men≥ 25%
Women≥ 32%
Cut pace1.0–1.5%
Protein1.6–2.0
Cardiometabolic load climbs from here. Aggressive deficits are best tolerated at this band.

Sources: Helms 2014 (protein during deficit, scaled by leanness) · Garthe 2011 (fast vs slow cuts on lean retention) · Longland 2016 (high protein + deficit + lifting drives recomposition) · Mountjoy 2014 (RED-S risk below the essential floor) · Barakat 2020 (recomposition is also possible at maintenance or in a small surplus for novices and detrained lifters).

Picking a method you can repeat

Three methods, three precision levels. Visual is the fastest sanity check. The U.S. Navy method uses tape circumferences and lands within ~3 to 4 percentage points of DEXA. 3-site skinfolds with calipers come in around ~3.5 pp when technique is consistent. None of them are DEXA, but all three track recomposition cleanly if you stay with one.

For body recomposition the digit doesn't matter. The slope does. Re-measure the same way at the same time of day every 4 weeks. A 1.5-percentage-point drop across two months means recomposition is working, regardless of whether the absolute number is correct to the lab.

Body recomposition, asked and answered

Six questions people search when their body fat % stops moving.

Recompose with Recomp AI

The body fat % trend is the recomposition. We track it.

Body recomposition is invisible to the scale. Recomp AI ties body fat % to lean mass, macros, and weight trend in one chat, so the slope is right there every morning.